2007. In many
works of literature, past events can affect, positively or negatively, the
present activities, attitudes, or values of a character. Choose a novel or play
in which a character must contend with some aspect of the past, either personal
or societal. Then write an essay in which you show how the character's
relationship to the past contributes to the meaning of the work as a whole.
In
Edward Albee’s The American Dream,
the Young Man has to deal with the effects of the mutilation of his twin
brother on himself, an event that occurred some twenty years in the past. This
results in his inability to feel, his lack of direction and his passivity
evident in his behavior and words. Through this struggle, Albee emphasizes the
materialism and deterioration of the American Dream that are the focus of the
work as a whole.
When
the Young Man was just a child, he had a twin brother who lived at an adoption
center with him. Grandma reveals that Mommy and Daddy “bought” this twin
brother, but they grew dissatisfied with it and accordingly they got rid of him,
but not before punishing him through physical abuse. When he wouldn’t show
Mommy the love she wanted, she gouged out his eyes, just one of many body parts
that were cut off. Every time a part of the twin was cut off, the Young Man
lost feeling in that area, and as a grown up man he cannot feel anything but passively
lets others love him and enjoy the perfect image that they see in his
appearance. This is how the mutilation causes the Young Man’s present to be
different.
Another
aspect of the adopted baby that is very important to mention is that in the
story, he is always referred to as an object without gender. He is called a “bumble,”
and referred to as “the bumble” or “it.” This has huge significance for the
meaning of the play. A baby, usually a symbol of innocence and love, is turned
into a commodity and used as a means for Mommy and Daddy to experience
pleasure. By doing this, Albee is warning that we shouldn’t treat people like
objects that we can use to fulfill our desires and then discard when they no
longer serve that purpose. Relationships between parents and a child should not
be about the best interests of the child or the adult, but about love between
the two, and the materialism of modern society has threatened this.
The way
the Albee chooses to address the American Dream is also through the use of the
Young Man and his twin brother. The Young Man is called “the American Dream” by
Grandma three times, and he represents the “new” American Dream as people saw
it in Albee’s time. The new American Dream values things like money and the
ability to earn it, as the Young Man shows when he is very interested in all
things related to money. It doesn’t place any value on empathy or any sort of
feeling at all, but instead allows people to love it and attribute whatever
they want to it. The old American Dream, represented by Grandma, is willingly replaced
by the new one before the end of the play. There is a stark contrast between
the two: the Young Man’s appearance is flawless, and on the outside he contains
all of the qualities that people see as positive. Grandma, on the other hand,
is old, wise, and has many positive qualities on the inside that aren’t shown by
her appearance. It isn’t even possible to tell if she is a man or a woman, as
she implies that she really isn’t either, but possesses qualities of both. The
new American Dream certainly seems better, and after everyone meets the Young
Man their thoughts about Grandma are completely forgotten and replaced by this
new American Dream.
In his
character the Young Man, Albee created a mechanism through which he could convey
his thoughts on the old versus new American Dreams, and also how the
materialism in society was wrong and could lead to very disconcerting
situations.
I see you responding to previous peer reviews in this essay--you have a strong focus on the overall meaning of the work here, and have provided a good amount of evidence. You're struggling with writing a strong, clear thesis paragraph, though, and as a result your overall argument is a bit off target.
ReplyDeleteI would agree with Mrs. Holmes. You have a well written piece here, but you need to work on your thesis a little. I think you could just try and develop one clear concise sentence(s) that really convey what you are arguing and trying to prove to the reader. Mrs. Holmes also mentions that it makes your essay seem to get off target a little which could be fixed by rewriting your thesis. However, it is still a good piece with lots of evidence.
ReplyDeleteI also agree with the other two. Your paragraphs and evidence are excellent, but the thesis needs work. The first to paragraphs relate somewhat to the thesis, but the third talks about the present, not the past. Maybe if you outline your ideas more before writing, your essay will relate more to the thesis. Everything else is extremely well written.
ReplyDeleteThis was a very well written essay, but I think you may have summarized too much instead of analyzing. Your last paragraph is the best, in my opinion, as it offers a very good analysis and almost no summary. I didn't really see anything wrong with your thesis, but it seems I've been outnumbered. I also liked your integration of quotes; they were very well-placed and well-explained, and flowed well with the rest of your sentences.
ReplyDelete